We use cookies to better understand how you use our site and to improve your experience by personalizing content. Please review our updated Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. If you accept the use of cookies, please click the "I accept" button.I acceptI declineX
Skip navigational links

New Jersey High Court Says Physician Certification Was Not Necessary Part Of Automobile Injury Claim


HLD, v. 32, n. 11 (November 2004)

New Jersey High Court Says Physician Certification Was Not Necessary Part Of Automobile Injury Claim

In December 1999, Jenevieve Casinelli (plaintiff) was in an automobile accident caused by Wilfredo S. Manglapus (defendant). As a result of her injuries plaintiff was treated by a neurologist and a neurosurgeon for back pain and had to undergo physical therapy. In July 2001, plaintiff sued defendant for negligence in causing her injuries. Defendant moved for summary judgment of dismissal of plaintiff's complaint with prejudice on the ground she did not meet the requirements of the state Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA) because she failed to file a physician certification.

Under N.J. Stat. Ann. � 39:6A-8(a) a claim under the AICRA must include a physician certification that the plaintiff has met the verbal threshold requirement. Plaintiff filed reports by two of her physicians that her injuries were related the accident, but she did not submit the reports in certification form within 120 days of defendant's answer as required by the AICRA. Plaintiff later filed the physician certification in opposition to the summary judgment motion. The trial court determined there was good cause to extend the time for filing the certification and declined to dismiss the complaint.

Defendant appealed and argued the complaint should have been dismissed with prejudice for failing to meet the requirement of � 39:6A-8(a), and even if the complaint were dismissed without prejudice plaintiff would be barred from refiling because the statute of limitations had run. Plaintiff argued there was nothing in � 39:6A-8(a) that indicated the Legislature intended to have suits dismissed because the deadline for the physician certification had been missed. The Appellate Division held that dismissal without prejudice was a proper sanction for missing the filing deadline. Defendant appealed.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey affirmed the judgment in part and reversed in part on the grounds the physician certification is not a fundamental element of the AICRA and is not analogous to a pleading, and thus dismissal was not appropriate. The AICRA provides to purchasers of automobile insurance a choice between a policy providing for unrestricted recovery of non-economic damages and a policy with a "verbal threshold" limiting non-economic damages for certain categories of injuries. The verbal threshold was intended to eliminate suits for minor injuries, and the physician certification is necessary to verify that a plaintiff has a compensable injury.

Disagreeing with the Appellate Division that the proper sanction for the late filing of the physician certification was dismissal the high court concluded the requirement was not a fundamental element of the AICRA. The untimely filing of a physician certification is similar to a failure to provide discovery and the appropriate sanction depends on the willfulness of the violation. In this case, plaintiff's failure to timely file the physician certification did not prejudice defendant, and plaintiff had timely filed medical opinions of her physicians but in the incorrect form. The dismissal of the case would eliminate a meritorious case because the statute of limitations would bar refiling. Therefore, the high court affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss with prejudice, and reversed the dismissal without prejudice. A dissent disagreed with the majority's characterization of the physician certification requirement as not being a fundamental part of the AICRA and stated the failure to file should be treated as equivalent to a failure to state a claim.

Casinelli v. Magnaplus, No. A-105-02 (N.J. Sept. 22, 2004). To read the case, go to

Health Lawyers thanks Lisa D. Taylor, of St. John & Wayne, L.L.C., in Newark, New Jersey, for sending us a copy of this opinion.


© 2018 American Health Lawyers Association. All rights reserved. 1620 Eye Street NW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20006-4010 P. 202-833-1100 F. 202-833-1105