D. Ass�n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Sebelius, 1:10-CV-499 (D.D.C.)
(This includes a challenge to the employer mandate and a number of issues that appear unrelated
to ACA: (1) Challenge to the requirement that physicians participate in Medicare Part A to receive
social security benefits; (2) challenge to the ACA employer mandate; (3) challenge to the ability of the federal government to promulgate or enforce standards for health insurance; (4) challenge to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) interim final rule requiring providers to have an HHS-approved enrollment or opt-out record in PECOS in order to refer to Medicare Part B; (5) enjoin HHS from requiring non-Medicare provider to enroll with Medicare, to appear in PECOS, or to obtain a NPI; (6) seeks to require HHS to submit an accounting on the solvency of Medicare and Social Security to the court).
1. Second amended complaint (filed 9/13/10; case on hold pending SCOTUS decision, the D.C. circuit�s resolution of the Hall case, or SCOTUS granting AAPS leave to intervene in Florida case).
2. Briefs on motion to dismiss
a. Sebelius, et al. motion to dismiss (filed 11/22/10).
b. AAPS opposition to motion to dismiss (filed 1/10/11).
c. Sebelius, et al. reply brief (filed 2/14/11).