AHLA, American Health Lawyers Association
A A A
Home  |  Sign In  |  Contact Us  |  Job Bank
AHLA » News Center » Daily Archive » FTC files lawsuit to block deal between brand-name drugmaker, three generic companies Leading health law to excellence through education, information and dialogue lktw
Follow AHLA  

In Daily Archive:

AHLA ConnectionsExpand AHLA Connections
Health Lawyers WeeklyExpand Health Lawyers Weekly
Health and Life Sciences Law Daily
Health Law Digest
Health Law Documents
Press RoomExpand Press Room
    
Print this page Print this page
Email to a friend Email to a friend

      

      

           Share this Page

 

FTC files lawsuit to block deal between brand-name drugmaker, three generic companies 

The Washington Post (2/3, A4, Layton) reports, "The Federal Trade Commission [FTC] has filed suit in federal court in an attempt to block a deal in which a manufacturer of a brand-name testosterone-replacement drug [Androgel (testosterone gel)] paid three competitors to delay rolling out cheaper generic versions." The state of California joined the FTC in its complaint. Officials with the agency "are hoping the case will ultimately reach the U.S. Supreme Court."

        The FTC "alleges that [Solvay Pharmaceuticals] agreed to share its profits with the generic firms provided they did not launch their low-cost versions until 2015," the AP (2/3, Perrone) explains. "Instead of competing against Solvay, the FTC states that the generic companies agreed to help market and manufacture" the product. The generic drug companies named in the lawsuit include Watson Pharmaceuticals, Par Pharmaceutical Co., and Paddock Laboratories. In its complaint, filed in a U.S. District Court in California, the FTC stated that "these agreements deny consumers the opportunity to purchase lower-cost generic versions of AndroGel, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars a year."

        "With the lawsuit, the FTC is now litigating two so-called 'pay-for-delay' cases," Dow Jones Newswires (2/3, Kendall) notes. In 2008, the agency "sued Cephalon Inc., alleging that the company paid generic drugmakers to delay competing versions of its best-selling narcolepsy drug Provigil [modafinil]." Dow Jones points out that the agency "has continued to attack such settlements even though some judicial circuits have ruled that the agreements are legal. The Supreme Court hasn't ruled on the issue." Three years ago, the Supreme Court "refused to consider the FTC's challenge to an agreement between Schering-Plough (SGP) and generic companies that delayed competing versions of K-Dur 20, a potassium supplement. In a widely noticed schism, the Bush administration refused to support the FTC's Supreme Court appeal in the Schering case." According to Dow Jones, the Obama administration may be more supportive.

        The Wall Street Journal (2/2, Goldstein) Health Blog, the Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal (2/3, Niemela), and Los Angeles Business (2/3, Poole) also cover the story.

 

 

Copyright © 2008 by Custom Briefings | 11190 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 130 | Reston, VA 20191

 


 
Related Resources
© 2012 American Health Lawyers Association
1620 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC  20006-4010
Phone: 202-833-1100   Fax: 202-833-1105
FAQ  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map